<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>in every dream home a friends band &#187; loudness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sgtwesman.net/tag/loudness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sgtwesman.net</link>
	<description>[Sgt. Wesman&#039;s Logan Square Friends Band]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>loudness civil war</title>
		<link>http://sgtwesman.net/2010/03/01/loudness-civil-war/</link>
		<comments>http://sgtwesman.net/2010/03/01/loudness-civil-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sgtwesman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loudness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgtwesman.net/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK &#8211; now that sticky whiskers is complete, I can comment on its loudness &#8211; first, let me take a moment to talk about my approach to this year&#8217;s mix as many of you know, this is the first mono mix i&#8217;ve done for rpm challenge &#8211; it seems like a simple thing, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; now that <a href="/sticky-whiskers">sticky whiskers</a> is complete, I can comment on its loudness &#8211; first, let me take a moment to talk about my approach to this year&#8217;s mix</p>
<p>as many of you know, this is the first mono mix i&#8217;ve done for rpm challenge &#8211; it seems like a simple thing, but it did force me to get out of my comfort zone and it certainly presented new problems in terms of balancing instruments</p>
<p>since many of the tracks were partially mixed as we went along, I was mostly concerned with loudness &#8211; I reigned in all the tracks so that they never went past 0.0 on the master buss &#8211; this was really hard because some of them were at +6.0 (the highest that logic will go) &#8211; on a side note, it&#8217;s still not clear to me why mixing to 0.0 is desirable since the mixes typically sound fine to me even when they go over but i digress</p>
<p>pulling everything down caused me to re-evaluate a lot of things &#8211; in the end, i think that the results are favorable &#8211; drums are clearer and things seems pretty well balanced &#8211; during the mix, i ran the tt dynamic range meter plugin (from <a href="http://pleasurizemusic.com/ja/ja/download">pleasurizemusic</a>) &#8211; i noticed some discrepancies between logic&#8217;s meters and the ones in this plugin &#8211; in a few cases, the plugin would report that my peak level was &#8220;over&#8221; (meaning 0.0 or higher) while logic was a -0.2 or so but aside from that, it worked quite well</p>
<p>i didn&#8217;t alter my approach to using compression very much in light of all this loudness talk &#8211; the reason is that i took all the compression off of <em>vultures</em> and it still had a dynamic range of about 8dB so i realized that i most likely was not over compressing things in my mixes</p>
<p>after the final mixes were done, i ran the wav files through the tt dynamic range offline meter (available from the pleasurizemusic link above) &#8211; this differs from the realtime plugin in that it is a stand-alone (windows) application and gives a single number for the overall dynamic range unlike the plugin which is an AU plugin that shows how the dynamic range changes throughout the song</p>
<p>there was a three-way tie for least dynamic range between <em>vultures</em>, <em>polaroid</em> and <em>red planet blues</em> which all had a dynamic range of 10dB &#8211; <em>the truth on brink hill</em>, <em>going nowhere</em> and <em>in the kitche</em>n all had a dynamic range of 11dB &#8211; <em>you love me too</em> ranked in at 12dB and, as expected, the award for highest dynamic range on the album goes to <em>cambridge</em>, with 13dB</p>
<p>the average of those numbers puts the album at DR11 which is not too shabby.  i re-computed the tracks from <a href="/cat-sounds">cat sounds</a> and <a href="/tabby-road">tabby road</a> using this meter for the sake of consistency &#8211; cat sounds, despite its quiet volume, is the least dynamic of the three records with a rating of DR10 while tabby road clocked in at DR14!</p>
<p>while we&#8217;re handing out awards, <em>babe, you&#8217;re mine</em> and <em>hello, it&#8217;s me again</em> are tied for most dynamic with ratings of DR18 &#8211; there&#8217;s also a tie for least dynamic between <em>there are no others</em> and <em>aftermath (reprise)</em> both of which have a DR9</p>
<p>so, now with all these interesting statistics, go back and listen to all the records and see if your ears confirm any of these findings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sgtwesman.net/2010/03/01/loudness-civil-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

